Scheduling oddities

October is over for the Avs, and now the schedule really gets odd for them. When most people complain about the schedule, it's usually because the Avs fans will get to see players like Sidney Crosby, Jordan Staal and Evgeni Malkin Thursday, and then not again for another 3 years. To be honest that doesn't bother me too much. I think most fans go to games to see their own teams and own players, not the opponents. I'm sure there are people in Denver whose favorite player is Sidney Crosby, but I'm sure there's a lot more transplants from a place like Edmonton or Calgary than from say Tampa Bay or Carolina (of course I could be wrong). This season though I have a different complaint.

Over the next month the Avs will play 13 games, 10 of those games will be against fellow Northwest foes, this will increase the stretch of mainly NW division opponents to an almost absurd 15 out of 19 games of playing NW rivals. In December, the Avs will play exactly one game, out of 14, against a NW division foe and in January they will play another whopping one game against the NW. The Avs then play a pretty balanced schedule until late in the season where they finish with 9 in a row against NW rivals.

The problem is that NW divisional rival games are more important than games against other conference foes, which in turn are more important than games against the Eastern Conference. When you schedule so few of those divisional games against your NW foes in December and January you're basically telling the fans, these months aren't as important. These games aren't as important. Save your money for later in the season when the games ARE important.

I don't have too much of a problem with the glut of divisional games at the end of the season, especially in the Northwest. The Northwest is expected (and is shaping up to be) incredibly competitive, and these teams will be battling for playoff positioning, or even playoff spots late in the season. In the West, getting a 3-seed is going to be critical for playoff advancement so battling NW teams will make that race to #3 more exciting for everyone.

But early in the season, the playoff lines haven't been drawn yet and teams are still jockeying for position and spreading themselves out. While the games are important the divisional rivalries don't take as much precedence as playing well and gelling, at least for fans. Look at the posts from all the Avs blogs. We are way more concerned about how the D is looking (pretty bad so far) and how the goaltenders are playing (pretty well) than how Vancouver, Minnesota, or Calgary is doing. Why? we know that if they are doing poorly (Vancouver) they have time to correct themselves, and if they are on fire (Minnesota until recently) they will probably come back down. It's not time to worry about them, yet.

If the NHL is going to insist on this division rivalry format (of which I don't have a problem with to be honest) they should at least do it right. The division games should be mixed in with the other games until late in the season where the importance should be placed on the division games. Yes a point in November is the same as a point in March in the grand scheme of things, but in reality a 4-2 win over Minnesota in November isn't as anticipated, emotional, or intense as a 4-2 win over 1st place Minnesota in late February, or March.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. nice post, i very much agree. what if the Avs play their best hockey in Dec and Jan? They could still be hurting in the standings because they're not able to beat their divisional rivals during that stretch.

    -thedoctor

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1) We realize scheduling 30 teams with other arena commitments, etc. is a difficult task, but there seems there has to be a better way than some of the "oddities" you have listed here, and some that we have noticed as well.
    2) Just as an example, the NY Islanders are in a stretch where they play 2 games in 11 days! Later in the season they will play 3 in 4 nights. Seems to be a bit uneven huh?
    3) Looking forward to a more balanced schedule next season. Seeing division rivals is fine, but it gets old after a while. Will be nice to see your Av's back here in the SE for the first time in a LONG while!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah I am torn on the whole scheduling thing. I like division rivalries, but at the same time I think seeing every team once/twice a season is important.

    The team I really felt got screwed was the Duck, who opened in London, and then came back to a road trip of 3 games in 4 days.. at Detroit, then back to back at Columbus and Pittsburgh.

    I didn't have a problem with starting the season in London, but considering no other teams had to do it, save the Kings, giving them a home stand when they got back seemed more appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And THAT is why I consider all the division rivalry games the Avs have had to play in October to be MUST-WIN.

    ReplyDelete